Banking License: Growth Killer or Growth Engine?

·
Listen to this article~3 min

Is a banking license a brake on agility or a lever for growth? Fintech leaders from Defacto, Younited, and Floa share their experiences with regulatory hurdles, capital requirements, and strategic choices.

Getting a banking license as a fintech sounds like the ultimate badge of legitimacy. It opens doors, expands what you can offer, and signals to the world that you're playing in the big leagues. But here's the catch: it also comes with hefty costs, long timelines, and strict capital requirements that can slow you down—sometimes right when you need to move fastest. So is it a brake on agility or a lever for growth? That's the question a panel of fintech leaders tackled at a recent France FinTech event in Paris, and their answers might surprise you. ### Why Some Fintechs Choose the Hard Road Take Defacto, for example. Back in late 2021, the French regulator ACPR asked them to clarify their operating model. They had to choose: get their own license or partner with an established bank. Either way, capital requirements loomed—directly or through equity covenants imposed by lenders. Defacto went for their own financing company license, which took 13 months to secure. Younited's story goes back even further, to 2009. They wanted to build a more responsible, digital approach to consumer credit, so they applied for a credit institution license. It took 24 months, but they got it in 2011. Then there's Floa. Their challenge was holding onto their license as capital requirements rose. Giving it up would have hurt partner trust, especially with buy-now-pay-later exploding and a European passport becoming a strategic asset. > "The license isn't just a piece of paper—it's a promise to partners and customers that you're here to stay," one panelist noted. ### One Size Doesn't Fit All Regulatory demands vary wildly depending on whether you're originating loans or distributing them, holding them on your balance sheet or selling them off. Your business model and stage of growth should drive the decision. As Younited pointed out, sometimes using a technology solution or partnering up can be a smart alternative to getting your own license. It's not about avoiding regulation—it's about choosing the path that fits your strategy. ### The Capital Conundrum In lending, every new dollar you lend ties up capital. To grow, you need to strengthen your equity to meet prudential ratios. There are a few levers you can pull: - Generate equity through profitability - Raise capital regularly - Transfer some risk, like through securitization The originate-to-distribute model lets you grow with less capital, but it comes with costs, operational complexity, and dependence on funding markets. Cross-border securitization still faces hurdles, too. Whether it's worth it depends on your stage and funding strategy. ### The Shareholder Factor For a licensed institution, shareholder strength is critical. Capital requirements apply continuously, and shareholders must be ready to inject more capital when growth demands it. Floa learned this firsthand: for years they had two shareholders, one of which hit tough times, forcing regular capital increase discussions. A strong, committed shareholder base isn't just nice—it's essential. So, is a banking license a brake or a lever? The answer, as with most things in fintech, is: it depends. But for many, the license is a key enabler of sustainable growth—if you can handle the weight.